I have to tell you...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 18:49.
Taking all the verses that are used to bend our thoughts in different directions putting down the Bible and following your good heart might be the best thing a violated victim can do.
We are violated when we are victimized and recognize the brainwashing and twisting, the duality, the hypocrisy and the contradictions.
Like being counter intuitive sometimes you have to do things that don't quite look right to get to the truth.
Normally I draw the forks out of material I drop off. I draw the forks back to the vehicle or tower. But the other day I would have been better identifying that if I sweep the forks away from the tower or vehicle I wouldn't fight so much with the overhead tree limbs. A good operator would know the best way to work efficiently, alas; I have developed habits that are hard to break. Looking back at the instant that I knew, I learned and will think more critically next time, or so I hope I will.
But this counter intuitive thought can be applied to the Bible the key question is this really the will of GOD?
Maybe a new look will open your eyes for the real good stuff that exists. Now that you know the absurd stuff that is not healthy.
I have a lot of thoughts from beginning to end.
I'd like to take another look at the Creation story to think on a procreative thought about the story of the fall of people.
There has been a lot written on this subject already and in due time I hope to cover more on those topics.
Peace,
"God's so called will"
Submitted by realityaudit on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 19:31.
Everybody's "God's will" is only something else to argue about. It isn't that important and I am tired of reading about religion. It is a waste of time and energy. The Bible is the same old stories...and there are millions, maybe billions of copies of the same old holy stories.
Well if the world isn't any different today than it was 2000 or?
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 19:47.
5,000 years ago, then we are repeating the same old stories, maybe we need to revist them same old stories and look for another way out of the cycle or loop that keeps repeating itself.
Let's start at the beginning again, let's look at the events recorded about creation? Do we know more today than they did way back then?
New technology reveals new things, especially in the universe.
Who is "we"?
Submitted by realityaudit on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 21:35.
Who is "we"?
I am tired of the brainwashing.
I book cannot brainwash you and
Submitted by realityaudit on Thu, 09/20/2007 - 23:47.
Many people believe in God, and their God fits all different descriptions. And the God authorities (church figures, and leaders from other religions) seem to know exactly what God's will is for everyone else.
You have the right to believe what you want, but don't force it on me.
I have read enough of the Bible to form my opinion that it is a bood filled with holes. And I have the right to say that.
Al Quaida isn't brainwashed either? Ask them. Religion begets extremists and they don't know they are brainwashed.
Some people are adept at brainwashing. Hitler was one of the best at brainwashing (of course, I don't believe he was a good person at all); are you saying that all of the German people at that time were weak minded? I don't believe they were.
Oh boy, I see a disagreement here....
Submitted by merryone on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 00:50.
I'm not familiar with the actual quote, so if you point me to a reference, I'll look - though I think this is a bit of a misinterpretation of the intent of the statement that was made by the Pope.
If you go to The Holy See (the Vatican's website - I don't have the link right this second but you can find it by googling) You can find the Church's stance on other denominations that are not Roman Catholic.
The following is an excerpt from the site which explains, in part, the beliefs we adhere to - I'll include the full answer (the numbers relate to clauses in a document of church teaching which can also be researched if you are so inclined). The third paragragh relates directly to the Church's stance on other denominations:
"...What is the meaning of the affirmation that the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church?
RESPONSE
Christ “established here on earth” only one Church and instituted it as a “visible and spiritual community”, that from its beginning and throughout the centuries has always existed and will always exist, and in which alone are found all the elements that Christ himself instituted. “This one Church of Christ, which we confess in the Creed as one, holy, catholic and apostolic […]. This Church, constituted and organised in this world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the successor of Peter and the Bishops in communion with him”.[7]
In number 8 of the Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium ‘subsistence’ means this perduring, historical continuity and the permanence of all the elements instituted by Christ in the Catholic Church[8], in which the Church of Christ is concretely found on this earth.
It is possible, according to Catholic doctrine, to affirm correctly that the Church of Christ is present and operative in the churches and ecclesial Communities not yet fully in communion with the Catholic Church, on account of the elements of sanctification and truth that are present in them.[9] Nevertheless, the word “subsists” can only be attributed to the Catholic Church alone precisely because it refers to the mark of unity that we profess in the symbols of the faith (I believe... in the “one” Church); and this “one” Church subsists in the Catholic Church.[10]
..."
So, from my perspective, if I understand your post correctly, it's a combination of things that are at play here - first, we don't believe that the Church is a man made organization, we trace our inception directly back to Christ. The idea that other Christian churches are not the 'one' can be interpreted as a matter of language - the actual teaching neither denegrates nor invalidates the sanctity of other denominations - the belief is, in the end all Christians will come together in the one true Church of Christ.
Wow, Merryone, my internet connection has been down all day
Submitted by Familyfunandfaith on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 18:20.
at home, so I came to the office to do a few things. It seems as though I missed out on a fun discussion. As you know I appreciate the fact that you are willing to discuss your faith and state your positions openly and passionately. It is one of the reasons I enjoy you so much.
My post was prompted by an article this week is the Houston Chronicle called Vatican reasserts Roman Catholic primacy, here it is in full
July 10, 2007, 10:53PM
Vatican reasserts Roman Catholic primacy
Statement cites defects of other Christian churches
By FRANCIS X. ROCCA
Religion News Service
VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Tuesday reasserted the primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, saying that other Christian churches suffer defects and that Protestant denominations cannot be called churches "in the proper sense."
The statement, "ratified and confirmed" by Pope Benedict XVI and published with his approval, purports to correct "erroneous interpretation" and "misunderstanding" of the teachings of the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s, which paved the way for ecumenical dialogue between Catholics and other Christians.
The new document said Vatican II "neither changed nor intended to change" the teaching that the "one Church of Christ ... subsists in the Catholic Church" alone. Other Christian denominations, it argues, can also be "instruments of salvation," but "suffer from defects."
The statement brought swift criticism from Protestant leaders. "It makes us question whether we are indeed praying together for Christian unity," said the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, a fellowship of 75 million Protestants in more than 100 countries.
"It makes us question the seriousness with which the Roman Catholic Church takes its dialogues with the reformed family and other families of the church," the group said.
It was the second time in a week that the pope has addressed what he says are erroneous interpretations of Vatican II, the meetings that modernized the church. On Saturday, he revived the Latin Mass — a move cheered by traditionalists.
Tuesday's document said Eastern Orthodox churches, though lacking communion with Rome, nonetheless deserve the term "church" because their priests follow in the succession of bishops and priests that started in the early Christian church.
Protestant denominations, however, "because of the absence of the sacramental priesthood, have not preserved the genuine and integral substance of the Eucharistic Mystery," and are therefore to be termed mere "Christian communities."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
How can you prove that Jesus actually died on the cross?
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 21:27.
Are you going to offer recolections of writers that wanted to believe that Jesus actually died?
They couldn't see the obvious so they wrote from their perspective. What other examples do you need to read that we should be familiar with when it comes to current events. It is the same lie being told over and over.
What is the truth, one pole a pole and a beam it doesn't mean that Jesus actually died on one or the other design your content has nothing to do with proving the answer to the question.
What are the Myths of Jesus?
Did Jesus actually exist?
These are important questions to ask before you listen to any leader of any organized religion that wishes to hold to a flawed doctorine.
How do I know the Bible has a flawed doctorine, well let's start with the fact that I can read, and if I can read I can write.
Could Jesus write? I'll bet that everything that Jesus ever wrote was destroyed.
How can you find what no longer exists?
What I believe is that Jesus taught from the heart, and that the teachings of the Heart of GOD are divine. From that perspective you will have knowledge of good and bad.
Oral Tradition
Submitted by communat on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 10:15.
Gary wrote: "Could Jesus write? I'll bet that everything that Jesus ever wrote was destroyed."
What does that have to do with the cross? In Jesus time and before, most things were transmitted by oral tradition. The authors of the biblical books set history to text for future generations. One of Jesus' many names is in fact, "The Word."
__________________________
Yours,
Communat / Mark Whitbeck
Founder / Communati.com
You talk. I'll listen.
My post was not about doubt...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 21:30.
but about the means of his execution.I'm not a great church going man, but I have no doubts about Jesus. What gets up my nose is the drivel that some attribute to this man.
Doubt is the other side of the coin...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:22.
I have no doubt that Jesus existed, what I doubt is as you say the drivel that some attribute to the man.
In the day a virgin birth was the first birth of a child. The term virgin has evolved into a term of purity and abstinence so this new translation flaws the script.
The death on the cross that could easily have been a revival was turned into a grave error by worshipping the person and not following the teachings.
Would Jesus want to be worshipped as the tool for war?
From the perspective of GOD Or The ultimate Sacrafice
There is a diplomatic solution and Islam like the enemy of democracy that is just like the word Communist was as it was created for and used back in the 1950's to create the cold war.
The new enemy isn't the terrorist, it is the Islamist.
President Bush is turning the war straight into a religious war based upon idealistic values.
President Bush and his supporters are going to lose big...
Now you have hit it...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:31.
Islam is the new Communism!
Where did you get this?
Submitted by communat on Wed, 09/19/2007 - 10:18.
"In the day a virgin birth was the first birth of a child. The term virgin has evolved into a term of purity and abstinence so this new translation flaws the script."
You don't think people knew what a virgin was back then? C'mon. People could build pyramids and all sorts of wonders, but they didn't know a virgin was?
__________________________
Yours,
Communat / Mark Whitbeck
Founder / Communati.com
You talk. I'll listen.
You may find this post of
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:08.
You may find this post of interest.
Really it matters not whether he died on a cross or a stake, only that he died so that those who believed could be saved.
As someone said...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:08.
so long ago now, does it really matter?
I quickly read the first part of the article...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:13.
I agree. I put it on my favourites as a resource. Thanks, mate!
No worries mate. Also as
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:15.
No worries mate. Also as this post mentions, it seems that as two nails were used one would surmise a cross rather than a single post
In regards to two nails I
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 22:37.
In regards to two nails I meant one in each hand. It they had nailed him to a pole only one nail would have been needed.
Sire my understanding is this...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 23:04.
Jesus had to carry the cross beam to the pole onto which he would be placed and crucified with outstretched arms.
His legs were not broken and the spear used to pierce his side could have been a mechanical tool to give the illusion of being speared.
Jesus could have passed out from the lack of sleep two days or more knowing that this was going to be the real deal. Jesus needed to survive and have friends to help revive him so the real question is did Jesus die?
A better question that you need to ask yourself is did Jesus have to die for your sins? Are you a killer?
You see if your god requires such a sacrafice then your god isn't big enough to forgive with a word. If your god can't forgive with a word how could your god create with a word?
My GOD is the GOD of Creation. There is only one GOD and my GOD is not evil. My GOD does not have two parts one part wrath and one part love. My GOD is only Love, Pure and Holy...
The reason they did not have
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 23:16.
The reason they did not have to break his bones is because he had already died as was required to fulfill scripture. I am not a killer but according to scripture the answer is yes he did have to die. This does not make God evil as He knew that his Son would be resurrected.
In those days they believed in sacrifices of animals for the absolution of sins, but this was only temporary requiring more sacrifices. Jesus being without sin was the ultimate sacrifice especially because he went to his death willingly.
Ah had already died or appeared to be dead?
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 23:26.
There is a difference and that difference is enough to lead me to a conclusion that the death of Jesus was only a feigning of a person who was subject to extreme stress.
My wife feigned I thought she died, I called out to her and there was no response, then she revived, she wasn't out for very long, but it was long enough to give me a scare. And how could I explain what had happened? It was a real difficult time in our lives.
I believe that her heart stopped because her complexion went very pale... It was quite the kiss...
One believes what one
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 09/08/2007 - 23:30.
One believes what one wishes.
Yep, Jesus died on a cross.
Submitted by communat on Sun, 09/09/2007 - 10:21.
So say the Scriptures, so I believe.
Are Scriptures reliable? See here.
__________________________
Yours,
Communat / Mark Whitbeck
Founder / Communati.com
You talk. I'll listen.
Interesting comments...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sun, 09/09/2007 - 19:56.
friends.
I'll remember that...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Fri, 09/21/2007 - 23:29.
mate next ime I'm strung up!lol
Hey Sire, thank you for the compliment...H0Z
Submitted by Hero of Zero on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 19:39.
...my poetry doesn't get that many plugs. Thank you very much for adding a link too. -Cliff Pyke aka Hero of Zero.
HoZ
Submitted by Sire on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 19:49.
As much as I like your poems, that wasn't me that gave the compliment, it was Gary.
You're right Sire, this is GWB's post...Oops!
Submitted by Hero of Zero on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 20:46.
...Sorry for the confusion there Sire. I must not have been paying attention to where I was when I came in to read this post. Oops!
...Well now, to correct my error...thank you Great White Buffalo, for the compliment and the link...I'm glad you like my poetry man! -Cliff Pyke aka H0Z
PS. I like the words and music of Roky Erickson(13th Floor Elevators/Aliens fame) it's poetic stuff. I don't really own any works of poetry or prose by the great poets of the ages though.
You're quite welcome
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 21:00.
Silken mentioned link love, it does feel good to be noticed for something that is creative and good, I see your talent shining through.
Submitted by Hero of Zero on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 21:24.
...So GWB, Silken calls that warm feeling of acceptance one gets when finding a link to there blog "link love" huh! I like that term, it fits the feeling...-Cliff Pyke
The Original "Think Outside the Box?"
Submitted by The Geminian on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 04:11.
what is it like now? Would you trade it for ignorance (and its' sweet bliss that I miss?)
To have pulled your head from the ground so long ago and from since till now, seen a sea of arses with their heads still firmly planted in the ground? It is a sh^dy outlook to have only seen people arses.
Man that was thousands of years ago and still so many "slaves." We are on a fool's errand!
To just put your head back would be better wouldn't it? If you could somehow unknow things?
__________________________
Always strive for Original Thought.
That sounds social without the 'ism'.
Submitted by realityaudit on Thu, 09/20/2007 - 22:09.
And without the confusion of who's will is it?
The show I listened to was interesting...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Thu, 09/20/2007 - 22:18.
I'm fixing up a post about that show and maybe if you follow up you can find an archive or pod cast and get the whole picture.
It was as I said it was interesting, although I think it is trying to do the same thing that has been failing us for so long.
We do need a little more freedom. The freedoms that we currently have are less than the freedoms that our parents grew up with.
Why is that?
The Freedoms
Submitted by realityaudit on Thu, 09/20/2007 - 23:07.
Do you have a certain segment of the population in mind?
The freedoms today aren't fewer freedoms than my parents grew up with.
There are more laws today, and some of those laws are good and to advance the freedoms of minorities. They are to stop the legal restrictions of the minority person the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The lack of freedom is in how many times the laws are broken. When a law is broken upon you, you have less freedom. The heavier the injuries, the heavier the burden, the less freedom you have. Your freedom was stolen. You are buried in burden. And if the culprit remains at large, they have your freedom, and theirs. The thief has stolen your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
And that isn't to say that criminal behavior only happens against minorities.
Also, many people today are more hung up on 'things', because there are more things to want.
The idea
Submitted by realityaudit on Fri, 09/21/2007 - 22:43.
Jesus started that. Peter lead.
And then Paul was to lead the early church.
The idea is all through the Old Testament. Scribes and Pharoses were leaders.
People have always needed leaders. And mostly the leaders are separate from the so-called common folk. The ‘Sheep’ need their shepherd.
Responsibilities?
Submitted by realityaudit on Fri, 09/21/2007 - 23:33.
Please clarify as to what you mean when you say responsibilities?
Poverty line
Submitted by gracepub on Tue, 07/10/2007 - 18:27.
I had a talk with my daughter about that. She wanted to pay $40 000 to become a vet's assistant and make the same wages she would working as a night supervisor in a local fast food joint. Stupid.
I would like to see this man's budget. I could probably tell you why he still owes on his loan.
I once knew a man raising 3 girls on $14 000 a year. He didn't owe a mortgage, and lived in a very rural area. The girls had 'enough' and dressed nice. When I asked how he did it (because my X was a project manager and I barely fed my 2 kids) This man said, 'I budget daily. Each day has $XX.xx to spend. When it is gone, I do not spend anymore.'
I have budgeted that way ever since. And, the funny thing is - about 4 years ago I attended a seminar where a business manager learned the same principal - IN HARVARD.....
preacher's salaries
Submitted by silken on Tue, 07/10/2007 - 19:01.
at least as far as I know, being married to a minister, are often hard to work with. we do have a comfortable lifestyle, but nothing as far as having cars, insurance or housing supplied for us-though a housing allowance is given for tax purposes. we have hardly anything saved for retirement. My husband had opened an IRA and we could only put in a small portion before our son was born. we lived without insurance or saving for the next 14 yrs. I think that last year was the first time since that we have been able to do that. It is hard.
I really like gracepub's suggestion. I've never budgeted daily.
Wrong Religion
Submitted by gracepub on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 01:07.
Either you are in the wrong religion, or the wrong country. The pastor down the road makes sixty thousand, plus house allowance, for a church with a 32 person membership.
The base amount in this religion is $45 000. I thought most people became pastors because they received a fixed income for working 2 - 3 days a week. - guess not.
24/7 for the preachers I know
Submitted by silken on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 20:47.
and when they are not in the office, out ministering, visiting the sick and needy, doing camps and bible studies, they are "on call" for the rest of the day....
I heard this story on NPR this morning as well..in debt preacher
Submitted by American Rhetor... on Tue, 07/10/2007 - 21:40.
Well I have so say I listened to this as well. The funny thing that stuck out for me was that this is a man of "God" who ignored his bills hoping they would go away..... Now I don't know about his religion but that is hardly something I would expect a preacher to do.... what's with that????
I know a lot of people who have had student loans. Yes it does make your life a bit slow on the starting line but the reason one goes to college is to get an education to be able to support ones self. Why in Gods name would he take a loan to get a job that wouldn't pay for the schooling? Not too bright if you ask me.. But you didn't....
Anyways, I never had a debt that just "went away" and I don't suspect many of you have either. Only "values" have taught me that you must take care of your debt. You make your own bed......
I guess this preacher was probably preaching "family values" and forgot about the rest of them... don't you know????I do know, I have values also...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 22:25.
I'd like to thank everyone that took the time to think about this or had listened to the story as aired on NPR...
Indeed I've found a couple of things missing, a slanted view being sold as 'the way' and yet I know differently.
I like the daily budget, I think we all live on a daily budget in one way or another. The budget was a big part of my computer program that I had designed. Something that we all need to watch, for some minute by minute, or day by day, for others it is a weekly, monthly or anual project. I'd love to never have to think about the budget again...
I preach in a fellowship in which every congregation is
Submitted by Familyfunandfaith on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 23:41.
autonomous and determines what it will pay the minister. Most of the places that I have had association with try to pay the minister as the median of the community, with the intention that the minister live like the people to whom he preaches. I do not know much about how denominational churches that have national organizations and structures for ministers.
My income includes a housing allowance for tax purposes. I am responsible for my retirement funds and insurance.
I believe it is improper, even sinful, not to pay your bills, especially if you hold yourself out to be a minister of God. If you sign your name to a contract, you have made a promise to repay the loan. If something happens that puts one in financial trouble, he should do all in his power to clear the problem even if it takes longer than originally expected.FF and F...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 19:38.
To me that is the golden rule, I always try to follow through on my promises. My word is my name and when I put my name to a contract that is free of bias and agree to pay a certain fee, the fee will be paid. That is how I was raised by my father. I have a good name and if I give you my word it is as good as my name. Contracts can be broken and things can change over time, but if you or anyone upholds their end of the bargain (contract) then I will uphold my end. At the same time if we are talking financial agreements and one falls upon hard times, the contract should be open for renegotiation. Many contracts are totally flawed when it comes to flexibility, many people end up extremely punished for minor breeches...
Back To:
I always have believed in
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 21:18.
I always have believed in the Bible and doesn't Jesus himself say that those who follow his way will be persecuted. The disciples of old would have welcomed the persecution.
What parts of the Bible do you believe?
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 01:37.
The whole Bible isn't true, do you know which parts are filled with error?
Let's talk about the Lie in the Tithe, have you ever considered that tithing is flawed, and if it is reasonable to know that by critically thinking about the tithe and understanding the flaw of the tithe then there might also be other errors?
From beginning to end, the Bible is full of errors, and many churches try to pass the flaws off as divine infallible writings of my GOD who is pure and holy, without blemmish.
Well if the Bible isn't without error, and the chruch lies and calls the Bible inerrant, I would say that there is a problem with the foundation of the church and the Bible.
How do you teach people to be good?
Now this is the Christian backyard that we are playing in, what about the Jewish and Islamic religious boxes? Their playpens are also soiled...
You either believe it in its
Submitted by Sire on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 01:40.
You either believe it in its entirety or not at all.
Now who said it can only be one way or the other?
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 01:52.
A good lie has some truth in it...
Either you know or you don't, so don't kick the messenger until you know for sure one way or the other.
The next time you go to church you might hear clear as a bell things that just ain't so...
Things will start to fall apart and become unsettled, and finally it will all make sense and you'll know what I was trying to write to you about.
That's a book filled with a lot of errors, I can't explain all the problems in just a post or two...
But remember that all...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 21:28.
in the church are human, and being human we are all flawed. The difference between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom is that we 'humans' have the power of reason. We need to use that reasoning power ourselves to understand what is going on around us, not just what some other human told us. We need to question what is said, and come to an understanding ourselves. In the words of some old and departed Kiwi - dont be a bloody sheep!
Now isn't it funny mate that
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 21:35.
Now isn't it funny mate that kiwis always refer to sheep.
We actually get it from...
Submitted by huttriver14 on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 21:38.
our Aussie cousins and becomes a habit. A sheep of course is just a follower.However I dont think the Anzac breed are just followers.
I knew that mate, I was just
Submitted by Sire on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 21:44.
I knew that mate, I was just pulling your leg.
Pass a leg over this way, please :)
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 01:48.
We are talking about leg of lamb?
Little jelly slow roasted...
We would be so lucky, seeing
Submitted by Sire on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 01:53.
We would be so lucky, seeing how a lamb on the spit is really tasty.
I am assuming by you mean right-wing radio!
Submitted by cajunrooster on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 17:17.
What are you going to do to change the voice? What about Air America and other lilberals on the radio. They went under for one simple reason; no one listened to them. Rush Limbaugh enjoys great success because he's on over 500 stations and millions listen to him. Do you think he'd be on the radio if no one listened to him. The left's message is void. Just void. There is nothing in it. The reason we don't have left wing radio is simple.
Caji, read what your RepublicMenu writes...
Submitted by TheGreatWhiteBuffalo on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 17:34.
Are you any different than this person?
You hold to the same sweet values in support of all the same beliefs as he does.
You divide everything right and left and there is no middle ground. The worst part is you don't know me, and my words are right here to be reviewed, do I support lies? Do I call for the killing of innocent people?
What do you know about me and my beliefs, talk about left wing radio... I'm the nicest man to be hated by all sectors of society with exception to those that really know love...
I stand in the center, not on the extreme left or right.
I believe in Freedom, and Justice for all that respect our laws.
I'm really sad that Republicans just don't get the message, they are caught in a lie, they are exposed for being bullies and greedy and still they are the church and the supporters of corruption, they are the military and sending loved ones off to the killing fields, the desert of death.
The bloodshed is on your hands, and the power is in your hands.
